By the Exhibition Stall Design editorial team · Updated 1 October 2026 · 9 min read
Short answer
A kiosk design brief needs thirteen fields: company and brand, event and venue, build-up and show dates, stall area, number of open sides, height limit, one primary goal with a number attached, who you want to meet, what you are featuring, must-have zones, brand assets and references, budget range, and who approves by when. Fill all thirteen and you can compare quotes line for line. Leave any of them blank and the supplier has to assume — and an assumption is always priced for the worst case.
Key takeaways
- One page is enough. A dozen fields, a budget range and three reference images beat a five-page document with no numbers in it.
- State one primary goal with a number attached. "Build brand awareness" and "book 40 distributor meetings" produce two completely different results at the same cost.
- Share the budget as a range. A supplier who does not know the band will either over-design and lose your week, or under-design and lose the show.
- Every blank field becomes an assumption, and every assumption is priced for the worst case. That is the whole argument for filling it in.
- Area and open sides do more to the price than any design decision. 24 sq.m with two open sides and 24 sq.m inline are not the same job.
- Give product weights and power requirements. Without them plinths and sockets are sized by assumption and rebuilt on site.
Why the brief, not the supplier, decides the quote
A spread of quotes is usually read as a spread of competence. It is far more often a spread of guesses. Fix the dimensions, the dates, the specification and the outcome and competent suppliers converge; leave those open and each one fills the blanks differently, which is exactly what produces three prices that cannot be reconciled.
That matters commercially. Marketing heads, brand managers and event agencies who need a stall concept that is approved quickly and builds exactly as rendered, and the complaint that follows a bad procurement round is almost always the same: the quotes were not comparable. They were not comparable because the brief did not fix the variables. For kiosk design the variables that move the price most are number of concept options and revision rounds, depth of 3D work (stills, 360° views or walkthrough video) and technical drawing detail required by the organiser — and all of them are things only you can state.
Then there is the schedule. Every missing field is a round trip, and round trips happen at the very front of the project where the lead time is already tight — 4 weeks for a stall of this size. An hour spent gathering answers before you send anything is the single highest-return hour in an exhibition project.
A supplier cannot leave a gap unpriced. Every blank field becomes an assumption, and the safe assumption is the expensive one.
The fields, their reasons, and worked answers
This table is the template. The left column is what to write; the middle column is the reason a supplier asks, so you can judge for yourself whether an answer is good enough; the right column is a worked answer from a complete brief — industrial pump manufacturer, selling to plant engineers and EPC contractors, working with 24 sq.m (6 × 4 m).
Use the middle column as a test. An answer that would not let you make the decision described is not yet an answer. That is the difference between a brief that produces a proposal and one that produces a question.
| Field | Why it is asked | Example answer |
|---|---|---|
| Company, brand and what you sell | Sets the design language, the technical register of the graphics, and whether the work should read as engineering-led or consumer-facing | Industrial pump manufacturer, selling to plant engineers and EPC contractors |
| Build-up, show and dismantle dates | Every other date in the project is calculated backwards from this one | Build-up two days before; show three days; dismantle the final night |
| One primary goal, with a number | This is the sentence the design is a solution to. Without it the work optimises for looking finished | Book 40 qualified distributor meetings across three days |
| Who you want to reach | Sets how open or how focused the whole thing has to be, and from how far away it must read | Plant maintenance heads and procurement managers; mostly pre-booked, some walk-in |
| Brand assets and references | Print-ready files decide whether graphics can be produced at all; references tell the designer what you mean by words like "premium" | Logo in vector, brand guidelines, product photography; three reference images with a line on each |
| Budget range | Without it the first concept lands above or below your band and a revision round is wasted | ₹4–5 lakh, excluding venue charges and GST |
| Approvers and decision date | Tells the supplier how many revision rounds to plan for and whether your dates are realistic | Marketing head approves; sign-off within five working days of the concept |
| Stall area in sq.m | It sets the price, the staff count and the build weeks before any design decision is made | 24 sq.m (6 × 4 m) |
| Height limit and rigging rules | Fixes whether a hanging banner, a brand tower or a second storey is even allowed, and whether the organiser needs structural calculations | 4 m maximum; no rigging from the hall roof permitted |
| Must-have zones | Storage, meetings, demo, pantry and a seating corner all consume area, and what is left over is your display | Demo counter, closed two-seat meeting corner, lockable store for literature and bags |
| Reuse intentions | Decides whether to specify a modular frame or a one-off build, which is the largest lever on cost per show | Another show within twelve months; tell us what can come back and what storage costs |
Keep every heading even where the answer is "none" or "advise us". A deleted line reads as an oversight, and an oversight gets priced defensively.
The template itself — copy, fill, send
Here is the blank form. Most lines are a word or a number. Fill it in once, send it unchanged to each supplier, and keep a copy, because it is also the document you will check the quote against at sign-off.
Attach your reference images and brand files separately rather than describing them. Three images with one honest line each — "this layout, not this colour"; "this lighting, we do not need the moving element" — are worth more than a page of adjectives.
- Company / brand, and what you sell:
- Who buys from you, and who you want to reach at this event:
- Event name, city and venue:
- Primary goal, with a number attached:
- Secondary goal, if any:
- What is being shown, demonstrated or revealed:
- Elements you do not want:
- Brand assets attached (logo, guidelines, product photography):
- Reference images attached, with a line on what you liked about each:
- Budget range, and what it excludes:
- Who approves, and by when:
- How many suppliers you are briefing:
- Whether you need the quote itemised, and in what format:
- Stall / stand number, as allotted:
- Build-up dates and hours:
- Show dates and opening hours:
- Stall area in sq.m, and dimensions if known:
- Must-have zones (demo, meeting, storage, pantry, seating, reception):
- Whether elements need to be reusable at a later show:
What a usable brief actually reads like
A filled form is not automatically a good brief; the answers have to be usable. Here is the same information written out properly, in six short paragraphs, by the organisation in the example column above.
Almost nothing here is a design instruction, and that is deliberate. Describe the problem precisely and you will get a better answer than you would have specified.
01
Context
We manufacture industrial pumps and sell to plant engineers, maintenance heads and EPC contractors. Our buyers are technical, they arrive with a shortlist, and they want to see a cutaway and ask about service intervals rather than read a tagline. We have exhibited twice before with a shell-scheme upgrade, so this is our first custom stall and our first time at this size.
02
The space
24 sq.m (6 × 4 m), two open sides, corner, as per the allotment letter. Maximum height 4 m with no rigging permitted from the hall roof. Build-up is two days before opening, the show runs three days, and the organiser's dismantle window is the final night. We will share the exhibitor manual and our organiser portal login with the appointed supplier.
03
What we need the stall to achieve
One primary goal: book 40 qualified distributor meetings across the three days. Secondary: have the cutaway model photographed well enough to use the images for the next twelve months. That means a closed two-seat corner where a contract conversation is possible without shouting, a demo counter that works standing up, and a clear path from the aisle to the hero product that does not pass our own team first.
04
Contents, weights and storage
What has to fit: two pumps, the larger at 180 kg, plus a cutaway section model, along with literature, coats and bags for 3 staff, and a secure store so cartons never reach the display floor. Demo counter, closed two-seat meeting corner, lockable store for literature and bags. Tell us if any of that will not fit in 24 sq.m — we would rather know now than at concept stage.
05
The money
₹4–5 lakh for the stall itself, excluding the space rent we have already paid the organiser, and excluding GST. We would rather spend on lighting and the hero product position than on a bigger structure. If anything in the design can be reused at our next show, say which parts and what storage would cost, because we expect to exhibit again within the year.
06
The decision
Our marketing head approves, with one technical reviewer from the product team. We can turn a concept around in five working days, and we are approaching three suppliers with this identical brief. We need an itemised quote — structure, graphics, lighting, flooring, furniture, transport, installation, dismantle and taxes on separate lines — not a single figure.
The same brief, costed line by line
With every field answered, the quote is arithmetic rather than conversation. Here is what the brief above produces at 24 sq.m: the structure at the bottom of the published ₹9,000–₹18,000 per sq.m band, then each additional scope on its own line. It comes out inside the ₹4–5 lakh band the brief stated — which is what a budget range is for.
What to take from this is the split, not the number. 49% is the build; the remaining 51% is graphics, lighting, flooring, furniture, freight and crew. Within a lump sum those six lines are invisible and interchangeable, so a brief that asks for itemisation is asking for the only thing that makes two quotes legible.
| Structure, joinery and platform (24 sq.m at ₹9,000 per sq.m) | ₹2,16,000 |
|---|---|
| Graphics — tensioned fabric brand wall and product panels | ₹62,000 |
| Lighting — track, product spots, backlit logo | ₹34,000 |
| Flooring — carpet with cable management at the perimeter | ₹28,000 |
| Furniture — counter, meeting seating, lockable store unit | ₹24,000 |
| Freight to the venue and back | ₹36,000 |
| Installation, supervision, show cover and clearance | ₹44,000 |
| Indicative total, before GST | ₹4,44,000 |
Illustrative. The structure sits at the bottom of the published ₹9,000–₹18,000 per sq.m band; space rent and GST are outside the figure entirely. Finish level, city, build-up hours and AV all move it, which is why the brief exists.
Exhibiting soon? Let's build your stall.
Why filling it in is worth twenty minutes
This is the section worth reading twice, because it is the answer to "does it really matter?". A supplier cannot leave a gap unpriced. Faced with a missing field they either assume the cheaper case and risk losing money, or assume the safer case and carry the cost in the number you receive. Most assume the safer case, which means every blank field you leave is quietly paid for by you.
Worse, the assumption is invisible. You will not see "we allowed for the conservative case because you did not say" on the quote; you will just see a number that is higher than a competitor's, and you will conclude the competitor is cheaper when in fact they assumed the opposite.
| Field left blank | What the supplier has to assume | What it does to the quote |
|---|---|---|
| Primary goal | A general-purpose approach | Budget spent on looking impressive rather than on the one thing you came to do |
| Dates and times | A comfortable schedule | Night-shift and rush charges surface after the order rather than inside the price |
| Budget range | Mid-band, or the top of it | A wasted revision round in one direction or the other |
| Brand files | Artwork will be supplied later | The longest-lead item starts last, which is where shows are lost |
| Approvers and decision date | One reviewer, fast turnaround | Two rounds become four and the workshop or prep bay starts late |
| Stall area | Nothing can be assumed | No quote at all, or a rate you cannot compare against a total |
| Number of open sides | Usually the worst case — more finished faces | Priced for more structure, graphics and lighting than you need |
| Height limit and rigging | The conservative limit | You lose the vertical the rules would have permitted |
| Product weights and power | Standard plinths and a domestic socket | On-site rework during build-up, at build-up prices |
| Reuse intentions | A one-off build | A stand that cannot come back, so next year costs what this year did |
Every row here is a reasonable response to missing information. That is the point: the cost is not caused by the supplier, and it cannot be negotiated away afterwards.
Suppliers do not punish vague briefs. They price them safely, which amounts to the same thing.
Extra lines to add for kiosk design
A kiosk design scope has its own variables, and leaving them out is what turns a reasonable quote into a vague one. The lines below are the ones that matter. None of them requires technical knowledge to answer — only a decision, or an admission that there is not one yet.
"Advise us" is a legitimate answer to any of these and will get you a recommendation with a number attached. Leaving the line out gets you an assumption instead.
- Whether the design has to be submitted to the organiser, and in what format
- Whether fabrication will be awarded to the same partner or tendered separately
- Any corporate design standard the stall must comply with across markets
- Whether you need the drawings in a format your own procurement team can re-tender
- Who inside your organisation has refused a previous concept, and on what grounds
Mistakes that make a brief unusable
A brief fails in predictable ways, and almost none of them are about effort — plenty of unusable briefs are five pages long. What distinguishes the usable ones is numbers and outcomes rather than description.
The most common failure is adjectival. "Clean, premium, impactful" sounds like a specification and functions as applause: nobody disagrees and nobody can act. Swap each word for an audience action — stop, watch, sit, sign, film — and the same sentence becomes a usable brief.
The second worst is a different brief to each supplier. It feels efficient to add detail as you learn what to ask. It guarantees that the quotes you receive cannot be compared, and you will end up choosing on the basis of presentation rather than scope.
- Five pages of company background and no single sentence about the outcome
- Logos supplied as a low-resolution image lifted from a website
- Not sending the exhibitor manual, which contains the rules the design has to obey
- No area or open sides, which makes the quote arithmetic impossible
- Describing a look instead of a job — adjectives in place of audience actions
- No budget range, which produces either an unaffordable concept or an under-designed one
- Deleting fields that do not apply, so the supplier cannot tell "no" from "forgotten"
- Product weights and power requirements left out, so plinths get rebuilt on site
- No named approver, so revision rounds expand until production is squeezed
- Asking for a "best price" instead of an itemised quote against a fixed scope
Send it, and what comes back
Paste your filled brief into our enquiry form, or email it with your brand files and reference images attached. A complete brief comes back as a concept and an itemised quote, usually within 48 hours; an incomplete one comes back as questions, which costs you both a day.
From ₹60,000 per kiosk. We design free with every confirmed fabrication order, build in our own workshops, prepare and file the organiser drawings, and put one named project manager on the job from brief to dismantle. If your dates are tighter than the brief suggests is comfortable, say so in the brief and we will tell you honestly what is achievable.
- Digital screens
- Mall and airport compliant
- Reusable builds
- Storage and lockable counters
Frequently asked questions
What should a kiosk design brief include?+
The space, the dates, the goal and the money, in that order of importance — then who you want to meet, what has to fit on the stand, which zones are non-negotiable, your brand files, your references, and the name of whoever signs it off. One page covers all of it.
Should I share my budget with suppliers?+
Yes, as a range. Without it a supplier either designs above your band — which costs you a week and ends in a redesign — or below it, which costs you the show. A range is not a negotiating position; it is the constraint that makes the first concept useful.
How long should the brief be?+
Short enough to read in two minutes. The useful brief is a list of answers, not an essay: the scope, the dates, the goal, the money, the contents, the approver. Company background can be one sentence; everything a supplier needs in order to quote fits on a single page.
Should I send the same brief to every supplier?+
Send the identical text, word for word. The moment one supplier has extra detail, the quotes stop being comparable and you are choosing on presentation instead of scope. Add any new detail to all of them at once.
What if I do not know the answer to a field?+
Write "advise us" or "not applicable" rather than deleting the line. A supplier reading a shortened brief cannot tell the difference between a deliberate no and an oversight, and will assume the version that is safer to price — which is the more expensive one.
What does a brief like this cost to deliver at 24 sq.m?+
The example here comes to ₹4,44,000 before GST at 24 sq.m, with the structure at the bottom of the published ₹9,000–₹18,000 per sq.m band and everything else — graphics, lighting, flooring, furniture, freight, crew — on its own line. Space rent and tax sit outside that figure.
Do I need to specify finishes and materials in the brief?+
Not by name. State the finish level in words and let the supplier propose specific laminates, paints and substrates in the materials schedule. What matters is that the schedule exists and is named before you sign off, so the built stall cannot drift from the render.
Does this template work for kiosk design as well as for a plain stall?+
The core is the same; the additions differ. A kiosk design brief needs a handful of further lines that change the quote materially, and they are listed on this page. They sound technical but each is a yes, a no or a number.
Who should write the brief internally?+
One person, with input from everyone who will later have an opinion. The brief is also the document that resolves internal disagreement before it reaches a supplier — which is cheaper than resolving it across two revision rounds and a redesign.
Kiosk Design near you
Our crews deliver kiosk design in every major Indian city.
